Recomendaciones para la gestión de recursos en las unidades de cuidados intensivos durante la pandemia de COVID-19 / Recommendations for resource management in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemi

El presente documento tiene como fin proporcionar recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia para estimar los equipos de proteccion personal (EPP), los dispositivos médicos y los medicamentos comúnmente utilizados en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura y evaluación de la literatura gris. La evidencia se clasificó utilizando la metodología GRADE. Luego, se construyó un modelo predictivo para apoyar la estimación de recursos durante 30 días de la pandemia. En el desarrollo de estas recomendaciones se incluyeron 33 publicaciones con calidad de evidencia variable (calidad baja a muy baja), acerca del uso de EPP según el riesgo de exposición; manejo y re-uso de EPP, y las necesidades de fármacos y dispositivos médicos para la atención de pacientes con COVID-19. Es destacable lo difícil que resulta estimar y administrar la cantidad de suministros y equipos esenciales necesarios durante una pandemia. El modelo nos permitió predecir los recursos necesarios para proporcionar cuidados críticos durante 30 días de actividad pandémica. Dada la evolución constante de COVID-19, estas recomendaciones pueden cambiar a medida que evolucione la evidencia.

This document aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to estimate the personal protective equipments (PPE), medical devices, and drugs commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. A systematic literature review and gray literature assessment was performed, and the evidence was categorized using the GRADE methodology. Then a predictive model was built to support the estimation of resources needed during 30 days of the pandemic. In the development of these recommendations, 33 publications were included, with variable quality of evidence (low to very low quality). They refer to the use of PPE according to the risk of exposure; management and reuse of PPE, and the stock of drugs and medical devices needed for the care of patients with COVID-19. It is important to remark the difficult in estimating and managing the number of essential supplies and equipment required during a pandemic. The model allowed us to predict the resources required to provide critical care during 30 days of pandemic activity. Given the constant evolution of COVID-19, these recommendations might change as evidence evolves.

Lung cancer and the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations from the brazilian thoracic oncology group

New cases of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continue to rise worldwide following the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). The current pandemic has completely altered the workflow of health services worldwide. However, even during this critical period, patients with other diseases, like cancer, need to be properly treated. A few reports have shown that mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 is higher in elderly patients and those with other active comorbidities, including cancer. Patients with lung cancer are at risk of pulmonary complications from COVID-19, and as such, the risk/benefit ratio of local and systemic anticancer treatment has to be considered. For each patient, several factors, including age, comorbidities, and immunosuppression, as well as the number of hospital visits for treatment, can influence this risk. The number of cases is rising exponentially in Brazil, and it is important to consider the local characteristics when approaching the pandemic. In this regard, the Brazilian Thoracic Oncology Group has developed recommendations to guide decisions in lung cancer treatment during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Due to the scarcity of relevant data, discussions based on disease stage, evaluation of surgical treatment, radiotherapy techniques, systemic therapy, follow-up, and supportive care were carried out, and specific suggestions issued. All recommendations seek to reduce contagion risk by decreasing the number of medical visits and hospitalization, and in the case of immunosuppression, by adapting treatment schemes when possible. This statement should be adjusted according to the reality of each service, and can be revised as new data become available.

Crise no Brasil e impactos na frágil governança regional e federativa da política de saúde / Crisis in Brazil and impacts on the fragile regional and federative health policy governance

Resumo Desde 2014, o Brasil vive crise econômica-fiscal-política-institucional. Este estudo avalia se a implementação das respostas à crise contribuiu para fragilizar a governança regional e federativa do SUS. Trata-se de estudo de implementação, ampliando-o com duas categorias da saúde coletiva, o poder em Testa e o sujeito em Campos, compreendendo que a implementação desloca poder e constrói sujeitos. Analisamos dados públicos, de 2014 a 2018, organizados em quatro eixos de análise: a) instrumentos de implementação da resposta à crise; b) interferência do Legislativo e do Judiciário nos investimentos; c) marcos legais da regionalização; d) atores federativos e possíveis coalizões de defesa. Os resultados revelam redução de recursos federais, especificamente para redes regionais de atenção; aumento da interferência legislativa e judicial nos recursos da saúde, pela evolução das emendas parlamentares e das ações judiciais e mudanças nas diretrizes de regionalização do SUS. Observa-se deslocamento de poder dos arranjos regionais federativos para o governo central, parlamento, judiciário e serviços locais isolados. Conclui-se que a resposta à crise fragilizou a governança regional federativa do SUS, agravando os impactos da crise na saúde.

Abstract Since 2014, Brazil has been experiencing an economic-fiscal-political-institutional crisis. This study evaluates whether the implementation of crisis responses contributed to weaken SUS regional and federative governance. This is an implementation study, and two theoretical categories of public health, the power in Testa and the subject in Campos have been incorporated. It presumes that the implementation shifts power and develops subjects. We analyzed public data from 2014 to 2018, organized into four axes of analysis: a) instruments for implementing crisis response; b) parliament and judicial interference in investments; c) legal frameworks of regionalization; d) federative actors and possible defense coalitions. Results show reduced federal resources, specifically for regional care networks; increased parliament and judicial interference with health resources, due to the evolution of congressional amendments and lawsuits, and changes in SUS regionalization guidelines. There is a shift of power from federative regional arrangements to the central government, parliament, the judiciary, and isolated local services. It is concluded that the response to the crisis weakened the regional federative governance of SUS, aggravating the impacts of the crisis on health.

A crise econômica e a atenção primária à saúde no SUS da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil / The economic crisis and primary health care in the SUS of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Resumo Este artigo aborda a crise na atenção primária à saúde do sistema público de saúde da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, a partir de 2018. Tal município teve forte expansão da atenção primária desde 2009, adotando Organizações Sociais para a contratação de profissionais e gerenciamento dos serviços, qualificando a infraestrutura das unidades e priorizando a medicina de família e comunidade, além de adotar práticas gerenciais como normatizações de ofertas, avaliação e remuneração por desempenho, "marketing", dentre outras. Diante da recente crise econômica, a decisão do gestor municipal foi de reduzir equipes de saúde da família, considerando a atual Política Nacional de Atenção Básica e argumentando ser possível otimizar recursos (fazendo mais com menos). Neste processo, enfrentou resistências, que não foram suficientes para freá-lo. Pela ressonância desta cidade (segunda maior do Brasil e com destaque na imprensa nacional) e tomando como base documentos públicos e formulações sobre a gestão, a crise expressa na atenção básica deste município foi problematizada em torno das implicações da adoção de Organizações Sociais na sustentabilidade dos serviços, da condução dos processos de gestão e suas racionalidades bem como da atuação política de agentes sociais em defesa do SUS e da atenção primária em particular.

Abstract This paper addresses the primary health care crisis of Rio de Janeiro public health system as of 2018. This municipality has experienced a robust primary care expansion since 2009, adopting Social Organizations for recruiting professionals and managing services, qualifying the infrastructure of units and prioritizing family and community medicine, as well as adopting management practices such as standardized offers, evaluation and pay-for-performance compensation, marketing, among others. Given the recent economic crisis, the municipal manager decided to reduce family health teams, considering the current National Policy of Primary Care and arguing that it is possible to optimize resources (doing more with less). In this process, he faced resistance that was not enough to stop him. Due to the resonance of this city (second largest in Brazil and prominent in the national press) and based on public documents and formulations on management, the crisis expressed in the primary health care of this city was debated around the implications of the adoption of Social Organizations in the sustainability of health services, conducting management processes and their rationalities, as well as the political action of social agents advocating for the SUS and primary care in particular.

Clinical genetics and public policies: how should rare diseases be managed?

The implementation of a specific policy for rare diseases in the Brazilian Unified Health System presents challenges in terms of its rationale. Recognizing the importance of rarity in the context of public health means understanding genetics as one of the dimensions of disease and accepting that Brazil is undergoing a period of transition in health indicators. Although most rare diseases lack pharmacological treatment and genetic counseling constitutes the best strategy for their prevention, the cost of "orphan drugs" and their consequent lack of cost-effectiveness are still claimed as hurdles to the implementation of public policies in this field. Epidemiological aspects should not be used as isolated criteria for prioritization in public policies

Sistemas de alocação de recursos a prestadores de serviços de saúde - a experiência internacional / Resource allocation systems for health service providers - the international experience

O artigo apresenta as formas tradicionais de alocação de recursos a prestadores de serviços de saúde e se concentra na apresentação e discussão de experiências alternativas encontradas no contexto internacional. Aponta, ainda, as tendências atuais formuladas nos países da OECD, que consistem na adoção de sistemas mistos ou complementados pelo ajuste por desempenho, sendo este predominantemente referido a resultados sobre a saúde da população, ou seja, à efetividade dos serviços de saúde. Ainda, destaca-se uma tendência a adotar sistemas de alocação de recursos diferenciados, segundo o nível de atenção do prestador: aos centros de atenção primária responsáveis pela saúde da população de um dado território, corresponde a alocação de recursos per capita ajustada por risco (ou, em alguns casos, por linhas de cuidado), enquanto os hospitais são em alguns casos remunerados por orçamento global ajustado por desempenho e, em outros, por pagamento prospectivo por procedimento.

This article presents the traditional ways of allocating resources to health service providers and focuses on the presentation and discussion of alternative experiences found in the international context. It also shows the current trends in the OECD countries, involving the adoption of mixed systems or performance-related bonuses, the latter being predominantly referred to the effects on the health of the population, i.e. the effectiveness of the health services. It further stresses the tendency to adopt resource allocation systems that are differentiated according to the level of care provider: to primary care centers, responsible for the health of the population of a given territory, a per capita adjusted for risk factor is granted (or, in some cases, resource allocation defined for lines of care), while in other cases hospitals are either paid according to a performance-adjusted global budget or through prospective payment per procedure.

Why mental health services in low- and middle-income countries are under-resourced, under-performing: An Indian perspective.

The inadequacies of mental health services in low- and middleincome countries are often attributed to inadequate allocation of resources. This may not be entirely true. The experience in India suggests that a top–down approach to planning, divorced from the ground realities, poor governance, managerial incompetence and unrealistic expectations from low-paid/ poorly motivated primary healthcare personnel play an important role and may result in the failure of even adequately funded programmes. The ambitious National Mental Health Programme (NMHP), launched in 1983 and aimed at providing basic mental health services through the existing primary healthcare system, using the Bellary model, failed to achieve any of its targets over the subsequent decades. In early 2001, the NMHP was radically revamped. It was re-launched as part of the Tenth Five-Year Plan (2002–07) and the budgetary allocation was increased more than 7-fold. However, the programme faltered due to techno-managerial underperformance and the initial momentum was lost. The reasons for this failure are analysed and possible remedial strategies suggested. While the experience documented in the paper is country-specific and relates to India, it may hold useful lessons for other low- and middle-income countries.

The importance of "throwing money at" the problem of global health.

More funding from wealthy countries is required to improve health care and the infectious disease situation in developing countries. Although progress has been made, funds for fighting AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria remain inadequate. These treatable and preventable diseases together kill over 6 million people every year. Funds are needed to improve access to existing medicines as well as to increase research and development of drugs. The idea that "throwing money at the problem is not going to solve it" rightly holds that increased funding is not sufficient for solving the health care problems of developing countries. In order to work, funds must be spent wisely. This does not mean that increased funding is unnecessary.

Modelo de asignación de recursos en atención primaria / A model for resource allocation in primary health care

Resource allocation in primary health care is a worldwide issue. In Chile, the state allocates resources to city halls using a mechanism called "per capita". However, each city hall distributes these resources according to the historical expenses of each health center. None of these methods considers the epidemiological and demographic differences in demand. This article proposes a model that allocates resources to health centers in an equitable, efficient and transparent fashion. The model incorporates two types of activities; those that are programmable, whose demand is generated by medical teams and those associated to morbidity, generated by patients. In the first case the health promotion, prevention and control activities are programmed according to the goals proposed by health authorities. In the second case, the utilization rates are calculated for different sociodemographic groups. This model was applied in one of the most populated communities of Metropolitan Santiago and proved to increase efficiency and transparency in resource allocation.

Uma revisão do papel dos hospitais de pequeno porte no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) / Review of the role of the small-scale hospitals in the Brazilian Unified Nation Health System (SUS)

Este estudo tem por objetivo elaborar diretrizes que contribuam para a construção de uma agenda de readequação dos hospitais de pequeno porte do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS),por uma atenção hospitalar acessível, resolutiva e qualificada. Trata-se de um trabalho de revisão do papel dos pequenos hospitais no SUS, à luz de algumas categorias teóricas comoModelo Assistencial e Missão Hospitalar. Duas hipóteses motivaram o presente estudo: (I) a de que existe uma superposição de ações assistenciais entre os pequenos hospitais e osserviços de atenção básica, indicando a necessidade de redefinir o seu papel na rede deatenção à saúde, no contexto do SUS; e(II) a de que a reversão do modelo de alocação de recursos pode induzir essas unidades a assumirem um papel específico no SUS, gerandonovas relações para a consolidação de um sistema pactuado de atenção à saúde. A partir de dados da Pesquisa de Assistência Médico-Sanitária (PAMS), da Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), do Cadastro Nacional dos Estabelecimentosde Saúde (CNES), do Ministério da Saúde (MS) e dos Sistemas de Informação de Internação Hospitalar (SIH) e Ambulatorial (SIA)/SUS/MS foi definido o perfil da oferta dos hospitais de pequeno porte, levando em consideração características de capacidade instalada, incorporação tecnológica, presença de profissionais de saúde, produção ambulatorial e hospitalar, entre outras. Os resultados dessa pesquisa apontam que oshospitais de pequeno porte representam grande parte da rede hospitalar do SUS, sendo responsáveis por 21,22% das internações realizadas no ano de 2003. O perfil de produção revela que estas unidades desenvolvem ações de baixa complexidade, essencialmenterelacionadas às especialidades médicas básicas...